philosophical studies acceptance rate

In any case, since the wait time data looks to be carrying a fair amount of signal, let’s conclude our analysis with some visualizations of it. That leaves us with 11 journals on which to compare average wait times: The results are pretty stark. School Psychology International Scientific Journal & Country Ranking. As an innovator in the field of psychology and related behavioral science 1979, the Chicago School of Professional Psychology is a not-for-profit, accredited institution with more than 4,300 students. Referees' comments usually sent on, particularly in cases of rejection or requested revisions. But it’s also clear there’s some bias in the survey responses. The survey has accrued 7,425 responses as of this writing. The Journal Surveys project is a way for scholars to provide feedback about their experiences with journals. Do Phil Studies and Phil Quarterly really get the most submissions, for example? Undergraduate study in Philosophy. The journal is devoted to the publication of papers in exclusively analytic philosophy and welcomes papers applying formal techniques to philosophical problems. Phil Studies isn’t included in that report unfortunately, but Phil Quarterly and BJPS are. And the survey responses align much better with Mind’s reputation during that time period than the 2 month average listed in the APA/BPA report. The Faculty welcomes applications for this degree in a wide range of philosophical areas. (Draw your own conclusions about human nature.). Of these, 720 have no date recorded. It’s not as current as I’d like (2011), nor as complete (Phil Imprint isn’t included, perhaps too new at the time). Philosophical Studies was founded in 1950 by Herbert Feigl and Wilfrid Sellars. The APA/BPA report gives the average wait times at 38 journals. But for the present purpose—validating the Journal Survey data—we’re confined to look at 2011–13. Journals with lower article acceptance rates are frequently considered to be more prestigious and more “meritorious”.. So it’s helpful to see the whole picture. Consult the scatterplot! Notably, these are the three journals with the longest wait times according to survey respondents. Does gender affect acceptance? Locating acceptance rates for individual journals or for specific disciplines can be difficult, yet is necessary information for promotion and tenure activities. Philosophical Studies is a peer-reviewed academic journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition. MA in Counseling Psychology; Ed.S. For example, APQ is listed as returning 60% of its decisions within 2 months, 35% after 2–6 months, and the remaining 5% after 7–11 months. But in order to boast a low acceptance rate, a school must do more than attract top students. Here I’ll mostly assume these records are legitimate, and include them in our analyses. Accepted authors should wait: no. Here are the journals with 50 or more: How do these numbers compare to the ground truth? For a fuller picture let’s do the same comparison for all journals that reported their submission totals to the APA/BPA. Any US “directional” university, especially if you pay your own way. Our second group consists of 8 “specialty” journals drawn from another poll at Leiter Reports. Here I’ll restrict the comparison to journals with 30+ responses in the 2011–2013 timeframe, and exclude Phil Imprint because of the inconsistencies just mentioned. About 79% of respondents specified their gender. Only Open Access Journals Only SciELO Journals Only WoS Journals I’m not exactly sure. Because 3 of those 20 aren’t covered in the survey data, and I’ve included the “runner up” journal ranked 21st. This is because the pool results in many students (880 in the case of the 2020 cycle, about 19% of all offers made) receiving an offer from a College other than the one they applied to, or were allocated to through the open application system. To make this feasible, I’ll focus on two groups of journals I expect to be of broad interest. One way to check is to compare these numbers with those reported by the journals themselves to the APA and BPA in this study from 2011–13. I guess someone at the APA/BPA has a sense of humour. Here I’ll cap the scale at 15 months for the sake of visibility: And for the ridgeplot we’ll return to a cap of 12 months: Again, remember that the ridgeplot reflects out-of-date information for some journals. The ranking compares the top philosophy programs in the U.S. Read more on how this ranking was calculated. A journal’s average wait time doesn’t tell the whole story, of course. Or is there a website that I have overlooked? In general, the more prestigious a program is, the more competitive it’ll be and thus the lower acceptance rate it’ll have. Some journals’ wait times have been improving significantly, such as. Consistently so in fact: with the exception of Phil Review, Analysis, Ancient Philosophy, and Phil Sci, the surveys overrepresent accepted submissions for every other journal in this comparison. Looking at the data from all journals together, it seems not: In fact it’s striking how stark the non-effect is here, given the quirks we’ve already noted in this data set. View the most selective colleges by state. Most highly selective colleges now have acceptance rates in the single digits. But how reliable are these comparisons? My estimate is that 95% or more of the submissions are sent to at least one referee. It was the best guide I knew to my chances of getting a paper accepted at Journal X, or at least getting rejected quickly by Journal Y. University of Oxford undergraduate and postgraduate acceptance rates, statistics and applications for BA, BSc, Masters and PhD programs for years 2007 through … I tried contacting people involved with the surveys, but nobody seemed to really know for sure what happened there. The Best Colleges for Philosophy ranking is based on key statistics and student reviews using data from the U.S. Department of Education. The poll results identified 20 journals ranked “best” by respondents. We hope that it will help authors navigate the journal submission process. So, using the Journal Surveys to estimate the gender makeup of a journal’s submission pool probably isn’t a good idea. Remember though, the ridgeplot reflects old data as much as new. On average, it accepts just 4% of the over 850 articles submitted per year. Here’s the timeline for the rest: Two things jump out right away: the spike at the beginning and the dead zone near the end. In addition to the improvements at Mind mentioned earlier, Phil Review, PPQ, CJP, and Erkenntnis all seem to be shortening their wait times. And do they really get 4–5 times as many as, say, BJPS? What about acceptance rates? Men and women seem to be represented about the same as in the population of journal-submitting philosophers more generally. Through an excellent undergraduate major and an internationally distinguished graduate program, the University of Arizona Department of Philosophy offers students abundant opportunities to think deeply, analytically, and autonomously about questions fundamental to the place of the person in the natural and social world. For inquiries, please contact editors Wayne Davis davisw@georgetown.edu or Jennifer Lackey j-lackey@northwestern.edu 100% of authors who answered a survey reported that they would definitely publish or probably publish in the journal again It’s also not entirely accurate: … The match is close for most of these journals. Whatever your path in life, our philosophy MA offers invaluable assets: skills in clear thinking and careful reasoning, coupled with a knowledge of the history of ideas. A minimum of 3.5 GPA on a 4.0 point system, over the past two years of full-time study (a minimum of 10 full-course equivalents or 60 units) of the undergraduate degree. Accepted submissions are overrepresented in the survey. Like many other members of the profession, I have recently begun work on the tenure-letters that I’ve promised to finish by the end of the summer. All rights are reserved. • And we can use those figures to infer that 17.6% of submissions to these journals were from women, which matches the 16.4% in the Journal Surveys fairly well. The Power of Acceptance is far more than a "feel good" philosophy. Since the readership of these letters includes deans and others whom I cannot assume are familiar with academic journals in philosophy, I like to say something about the selectivity of venues in which the applicants for tenure have published. It’s also not entirely accurate: it reports an acceptance rate of 8% for Phil Quarterly vs. 3% reported in the APA/BPA study. We could break things down further, going journal by journal. For example, they’re within 1 or 2% of the numbers reported elsewhere by Ethics, Mind, Phil Review, JPhil, Nous, and PPR.1 So they’re useful for at least a rough validation. These data used to be available in the Guide to Publishing Philosophy, but a quick web search suggests that the Guide has not been updated in many years. The deadline for the payment is 17 December 2020. So I won’t dig into that exercise here. But then we’d face the problem of multiple comparisons, and we’ve already seen that the journal-by-journal numbers on gender aren’t terribly reliable. Keeping that in mind, let’s visualize expected wait times at these journals with a ridgeplot. This dead period is right around when the surveys were handed over to the APA. “More rigorous majors like economics, philosophy and math do better,” he said. Philosophy I figured disgruntled authors were more likely to use the survey to vent. The APA/BPA report gives the percentage of submissions from women at 14 journals. Advertisement. Authors are encouraged to submit information about how long it took for their paper to be reviewed, the quality of the comments received, and whether their paper was accepted or not, among other things. Nietzsche (Oxford Readings in Philosophy), The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy, « Libertarianism and the Workplace | Brian Leiter | University of Chicago - Academia.edu, Nietzsche's Moral and Political Philosophy (SEP), Routledge Philosophers (book series edited by Brian Leiter), RAWA Statement on the anniversary of the September 11 tragedy, Sep.11, 02, 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense: Scientific American, "The less they know, the less they know it", Deja Vu All Over Again (Repostings of Earlier Items of Interest), Merciless rhetorical spankings of fanatics, villains, and ignoramuses, Personal Ads of the Philosophers (and other humor), Sunday Classical (formerly "Sunday Symphonies"), Texas Taliban Alerts (Intelligent Design, Religion in the Schools, etc. Minimum education Applicants hold a four-year undergraduate degree with honours or a major in philosophy; however, applicants with a degree in a related academic field will be considered. So maybe the records for this period were lost in translation. But only 65 percent of religion majors matriculated into law school. How prestigious a particular grad school or program is can affect its overall competitiveness and selectivity. But since the dates attached to those responses are certainly wrong, I’ll exclude them when we get to temporal questions (toward the end of the post). In fact, if we’re forgiving about the rounding, only three journals have a discrepancy that’s clearly more than 1 month: Erkenntnis, Mind, and Synthese. The method of calculating acceptance rates varies among journals. I can’t comment on the discrepancies for Erkenntnis and Synthese, though, since I know much less about their reputations for turnaround. The acceptance rate of Studies in Philosophy and Education is still under calculation. So who uses the journal surveys: grad students? But we’re looking for something more specific: what portion of journal submissions come from women vs. men? The study of philosophy is central to the mission of every great university. Of those, 16.4% were women and 83.6% were men. And in many cases accepted submissions are drastically overrepresented. Blast from the past: when Robin James reported some important "theorizing"... COVID isolation periods should be shorter. Studies in Philosophy and Education is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on philosophical, theoretical, normative and conceptual problems and issues in educational research, policy and practice. (A study of the 2001 Law School Entering Class by Professor Carol Leach of Chicago State University shows the overall acceptance rate for Philosophy majors to be the second highest; only Physics majors were admitted at a higher rate.) Processing time: 2-3 months. I’d add that the reported 2 month average for Mind is wildly implausible by reputation. Please enable JavaScript if you would like to comment on this blog. The dirty secret of philosophy is that we have insanely low acceptance rates—often well under 10% —for papers. The definition of journal acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to Philosophical Studies that was accepted for publication. Gender doesn’t seem to affect acceptance rate. Programs with High Acceptance Rates. 2021 ranking of hardest colleges to get into based on acceptance rates and SAT/ACT test scores. PQ Essay Prize winner. The BPA and the APA have collaborated in surveying 43 Philosophy Journals. The survey records five categories: Graduate Student, Non-TT Faculty, TT-but-not-T Faculty, Tenured Faculty, and Other. That gives us a subset of 33 journals. The Philosophical Quarterly is one of the most highly regarded and established academic journals in philosophy. There are 155 journals covered by the survey, but most have only a handful of responses. But it might instead be a bias towards generalist journals, or journals with fast turn around times. How does this compare to journal-submitting philosophers in general? Posted by Brian Leiter on July 04, 2012 at 05:54 PM in Issues in the Profession | Permalink. Various other sources put the percentage of women in academic philosophy roughly in the 15–25% range. The PhD culminates in the production of a thesis of up to 80,000 words, to be submitted between three and four years from the commencement of study. | Socrates Comes (Back) to Athens... ». Still, the ESF values do seem to be largely accurate for many prominent journals I’ve checked. They reported receiving 2,305 and 1,267 submissions, respectively, during 2011–13. The Australasian Journal of Philosophy (AJP) desk-rejects very few of the submissions to it. The method of calculating acceptance rates varies among journals. This also let’s us see how a journal’s wait times have changed. So let’s compare with an outside source again. We hope that it will help authors navigate the journal submission process. Faculty? A few entries have no professional position recorded. It’s not as current as I’d like (2011), nor as complete (Phil Imprint isn’t included, perhaps too new at the time). A lot of journals publish data about submissions and acceptance-rates annually, but locating the information in back issues can be quite time-consuming, especially when a tenure candidate has published in 8-10 different journals. In that process the data were moved to a different hosting service, apparently with some changes to the survey format. Also interesting if not too terribly surprising is that seniority affects acceptance: Compared to grad students, tenured faculty were about 10% more likely to report their papers as having been accepted. I don’t know any other comprehensive list of wait times, though, so we’ll have to make do. The most comprehensive list of acceptance rates I know is this one based on data from the ESF. Double space manuscripts, with notes at end; avoid se xist language. #1: School or Program Prestige. This low rate is only defensible if you think that publication in philosophy has the kind of inductive risk that any false positive leads to society’s catastrophe. This surprised me, since I figured the surveys would serve as an outlet for disgruntled authors. But maybe it’s the other way around: people are more likely to use the surveys as a way to share happy news. The first is a list of 18 “general” journals that were highly rated in a pair of polls at Leiter Reports.2 For the sake of visibility, I’ll cap these scatterplots at 24 months. Acceptance rates increase with seniority. Have you ever submitted your manuscript to Studies in Philosophy and Education?Share with us! Editorial statement: Philosophical Books was founded by the Analysis Committee in 1960. Main This post is an attempt to better understand the survey data, especially through visualization and comparisons with other sources. Are acceptance rates the ultimate measure of selectivity? One good indicator of a journal’s selectivity is, of course, its acceptance-rate. Here are the acceptance rates for those journals with 30+ responses in the survey: These numbers look suspiciously high to me. This means that fewer than 10% of students who apply will ultimately be offered a place there. APQ and EJP on the other hand appear to be drifting upward.

New Balance 574 Black, 255/70r18 Bridgestone Dueler A/t Specs, 1979 Dodge Diplomat For Sale, Cigarette Brands In Moscow, Full Body Massage Mat,

Enter to Win

Enter to Win
a Designer Suit

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
X